反脆弱机制在安全风险管控中的策略研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.002

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 8-15.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.002

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

反脆弱机制在安全风险管控中的策略研究

宋守信教授, 陈明利^** 讲师, 翟怀远副研究员

北京交通大学经济管理学院,北京 100044

收稿日期:2020-09-30 修回日期:2020-11-16 出版日期:2020-12-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: **陈明利(1982—)女,四川自贡人,博士,讲师,主要从事安全管理、风险管理方面的研究。E-mail:chenml@bjtu.edu.cn。
作者简介:宋守信 (1946—),男,山东莱州人,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事安全管理、风险管理方面的研究。E-mail:songsx@yeah.net。

Research on strategy of antifragile mechanism in safety risk management

SONG Shouxin, CHEN Mingli, ZHAI Huaiyuan

School of Economics & Management,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing 100044,China

Received:2020-09-30 Revised:2020-11-16 Online:2020-12-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为有效防控安全风险,结合脆弱性研究成果,借鉴著名风险管理专家纳西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布著作《反脆弱——从不确定性中获益》中的风险理论体系,将反脆弱机制的思想运用到安全风险防控策略的研究中,阐释新的安全风险防控意识,提出基于反脆弱的安全风险防控杠铃策略。风险偏好端采用开发冗余、理性试错的防控措施;风险厌恶端采用脆弱性控制措施,并实例量化研究地铁站点火灾的脆弱性,运用突变理论构建脆弱性评价模型,根据评价结果给出相应建议,用以指导地铁运营火灾风险管理。研究表明:反脆弱视角下的安全风险管控既要考虑系统可能遭受的损失,也要积极探索风险可能带来的收益机会。作为反脆弱的重要环节,控制脆弱性是从杠铃策略中对风险极端厌恶的角度来实现安全风险的管控。

关键词: 反脆弱, 安全风险管控, 脆弱性, 杠铃策略, 突变理论

Abstract: In order to effectively control safety risks, antifragile mechanism was applied into research of safety risk prevention and control strategies based on vulnerability research and risk theory system from Antifragile-Things that Gain from Disorder written by NASSIM Nicholas Taleb. New awareness of safety risk prevention was explained and barbell strategy was put forward. For risk preference side, redundancy and rational trial was adopted while for risk aversion side, vulnerability control was adopted, and a quantitative study was made on vulnerability of subway stations in fire. Finally, a vulnerability evaluation model was constructed by using catastrophe theory, and corresponding suggestions were given according to evaluation results to guide fire risk management for subway operation. The research shows that safety risk management and control from antifragile perspective should not only consider possible losses of the system, but also actively explore potential profit opportunities brought by risks. As an important part of antifragile, controlling vulnerability is a way to manage safety risk from the angle of extreme risk aversion in barbell strategy.

Key words: antifragile, safety risk management, vulnerability, barbell strategy, catastrophe theory

中图分类号:

X915.2

宋守信, 陈明利, 翟怀远. 反脆弱机制在安全风险管控中的策略研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 8-15.

SONG Shouxin, CHEN Mingli, ZHAI Huaiyuan. Research on strategy of antifragile mechanism in safety risk management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12): 8-15.

参考文献

[1] 宋守信,陈明利.关于信息社会安全理论发展的几点思考:甬温线动车事故的启示[J].中国安全科学学报,2013, 23(3): 140-144.
SONG Shouxin, CHEN Mingli. New perspective on safety theory development in information society: inspiration from Yongwen line train collision in China [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013,23(3): 140-144.
[2] MARGAT J. Vulnerability of groundwater to pollution[R]. BRGM-Publication 68 SGL 198 HYD, 1968.
[3] 纳西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布[美].反脆弱:从不确定性中获益[M].雨珂,译.北京:中信出版社, 2012: 11-23.
NASSIOM Nicholas Taleb. Antifragile:things that gain from disorder [M]. YU Ke,Translated. Beijing: China CITIC Press, 2012: 11-23.
[4] ISO31000:2018, Risk management-guidelines[S].
[5] TIMMERMAN P. Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society: a review of models and possible climatic applications [R]. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, 1981.
[6] FOUAD A A, ZHOU Qin, VITTTAL V. System vulnerability as a concept to assess power system dynamic security[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(2): 1 009-1 015.
[7] BERDICA K. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done[J]. Transport Policy, 2002, 9(2): 117-127.
[8] GILBERTO C G. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 293-303.
[9] JENELIUS E, PETERSEN T, MATTSSON L G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 2006, 40(7): 537-560.
[10] SMIT B, WANDEL J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 282-292.
[11] BROOKS N, ADGER W N, KELLY P M. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(2): 151-163.
[12] 刘铁民,朱慧,张程林. 略论事故灾难中的系统脆弱性:基于近年来几起重特大事故灾难的分析[J]. 社会治理, 2015,4(4): 65-70.
LIU Tiemin, ZHU Hui, ZHANG Chenglin. On the system vulnerability in accident and disaster [J]. Social Governance Review, 2015, 4(4): 65-70.
[13] 宋守信,许葭,陈明利,等. 脆弱性特征要素递次演化分析与评价方法研究[J].北京交通大学学报, 2017, 16(2): 57-65.
SONG Shouxin, XU Jia, CHEN Mingli, et al. The mechanism and evaluation of vulnerability factors' progressive growth [J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong Universtiey:Scocial Sciences Edition,2017, 16(2): 57-65.
[14] 宋守信,肖楚阳,翟怀远,等. 基于脆弱性理论的地铁电气火灾影响因子研究[J].西安科技大学学报, 2016, 36(5): 691-696.
SONG Shouxin, XIAO Chuyang,ZHAI Huaiyuan, et al. Influential factors for subway electrical fire based on vulnerability [J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2016, 36(5): 691-696.
[15] 宋守信,许葭,陈明利,等. 脆弱性基本原理与控制方法[J].安全, 2020, 41(4): 1-7.
SONG Shouxin, XU Jia, CHEN Mingli, et al. Principle and control of vulnerability in safety risk [J]. Safety, 2020, 41(4): 1-7.
[16] 许葭,宋守信,袁朋伟,等. 基于ANP的地铁站点网络脆弱性评价[J].中国安全科学学报, 2015, 15(12): 129-134.
XU Jia, SONG Shouxin,YUAN Pengwei, et al. Evaluation of network vulnerability of subway stations based on ANP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 15(12): 129-134.
[17] POSTOM Tim, STEWANT Ian. Catastrophe theory and its applications[M]. London:Pitman Publishing Limited,1978:99-122.
[18] 林晓飞,宋守信,翟怀远,等. 拥挤状态下地铁乘客应激反应的尖点突变分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2019, 29(2): 112-117.
LIN Xiaofei,SONG Shouxin, ZHAI Huaiyuan, et al. Cusp catastrophe based analysis of stress reaction of subway passengers under crowed condition[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(2): 112-117.

反脆弱机制在安全风险管控中的策略研究

Research on strategy of antifragile mechanism in safety risk management

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	岳仁田, 张知波. 脆弱性多因素耦合作用下空管亚安全态识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 8-14.
[2]	路庆昌, 崔欣, 徐标, 刘鹏, 王琰. 公交接驳场景下轨道交通网络脆弱性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 141-146.
[3]	吴维讲师, 罗欣然, 魏明. 基于SD模型的跑道侵入风控网络脆弱性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 41-48.
[4]	杨天姿, 王铁骊, 彭恒明, 段海林. 小微企业生产安全事故应急脆弱性评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[5]	蔡玫, 王秋寒. Natech风险管理中的承灾体脆弱性评估方法综述^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 9-17.
[6]	李浩然, 王子恒, 杨起帆, 张亚君, 欧阳作林. 复杂网络下地铁灾害链演化模型与风险分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 141-147.
[7]	毛丁, 王芃, 倪龙. 供热及其关联基础设施网络脆弱性研究综述^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 155-162.
[8]	姜聚宇, 杨慧雯, 王东, 王来贵. 端帮开采支撑煤柱失稳演化机制试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 89-96.
[9]	韦善阳, 石美, 杨欢, 孙威. 木结构吊脚楼火灾轰燃临界值预测研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 35-40.
[10]	牟能冶, 康秋萍, 贾程方. 突发事件影响下的城市快递网络脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 125-132.
[11]	王军武, 吴寒, 杨庭友. 基于投影寻踪的地铁车站工程暴雨内涝脆弱性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 1-7.
[12]	温惠英, 薛刚. 山区公路交通事故多要素风险综合分析方法:以山区雨雾天气为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 161-166.
[13]	熊文泽, 靳江红, 唐军梅. SCADA系统信息安全定量风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 157-163.
[14]	裴甲坤, 王飞跃, 郭换换, 杨宸宇, 裴重伟. 基于改进尖点突变模型的化工事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 20-25.
[15]	李文龙, 李慧民, 裴兴旺, 刘怡君. 基于多因素耦合的山区道路系统脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 165-170.